What Psychology Has to Say About John B. Watson: Classical Behaviorism in Psychology Textbooks, 1920-1989
نویسنده
چکیده
Despite John B. Watson's considerable importance in the history of psychology and his celebrity status during the first part of the twentieth century, substantive discussions of his life, work, and views are now relatively rare. Passing references to Watson still appear in scholarly and popular works (e.g., Koch & Leary, 1985; M. Levin, 1987), but in-depth analyses, when they can be found, are confined primarily to publications specializing in the history of psychology. Only two of his widely read books are still in print (Watson, 1930; Watson & Watson, 1928) and the rest of his writings, although available in good university libraries, are not often read. In fact, the only academic context in which Watson retains a high degree of visibility is the general introductory psychology textbook (Knapp, 1985; Perlman, 1980). Introductory psychology textbooks are, of course, rarely counted among psychology's most important or influential works. Unless they have become classics (e.g., Woodworth, 1921, 1929, 1934, 1940), textbooks attract little scholarly interest (but see, e.g., Hilgard, 1988; Morawski, 1992; Winston, 1988) and are not intended to survive as archival documents. Even so, they may represent the most important single literature within academic psychology. Textbooks are published in greater numbers and read by more people than perhaps any other type of academic psychological work. Only a few thousand copies of the seminal work of radical behaviorism, The Behavior of Organisms (Skinner, 1938), have been printed (see Knapp, in press) and probably only a few hundred active psychologists have read it. In contrast, the publishers of successful textbooks claim readership in the millions. Because textbooks have become the only significant source for information about Watson and classical behaviorism, the manner in which they depict Watson and his views is an important issue. The potential negative impact on millions of students of possibly inaccurate and biased descriptions of one of psychology's most important figures should not be discounted—as an is sue in itself or as a case study of the widespread problem of errors and inaccuracies in educational materials (see Todd & Morris, 1983, 1992). The purpose of this chapter is, therefore, to examine depictions of Watson and classical behaviorism in general introductory psychology textbooks published from 1920 to 1989. It will analyze several important features of textbooks' coverage of Watson and show how that coverage has evolved since 1920. Three aspects of Watson's work and views will examined in detail: (1) his promotion of behaviorism and objective psychology, (2) his alleged environmentalism, and (3) the classic "Little Albert" experiment described in the article "Conditioned Emotional Reactions" (Watson & Rayner, 1920).
منابع مشابه
Test of time: what if little Albert had escaped?
Watson and Rayner's (1920) ;Little Albert' experiment has become one of the most famous studies in psychology. It is a staple of many general psychology textbooks and is part of the very fabric of the discipline's folklore. Despite this fame, the study has been widely criticized in the nearly 90 years since it was published for its lack of methodological rigour. This article attempts to evaluat...
متن کاملSocial Cognitive Theory*
Circumstances that led to the development of the Theory: The SCT has its origins in the discipline of psychology, with its early foundation being laid by behavioral and social psychologists. The SLT evolved under the umbrella of behaviorism, which is a cluster of psychological theories intended to explain why people and animals behave the way that they do. Behaviorism, introduced by John Watson...
متن کاملJohn Watson's paradoxical struggle to explain Freud.
John Watson was fascinated by the discoveries of psychoanalysis, but he rejected Freud's central concept of the unconscious as incompatible with behaviorism. After failing to explain psychoanalysis in terms of William James's concept of habit, Watson borrowed concepts from classical conditioning to explain Freud's discoveries. Watson's famous experiment with Little Albert is interpreted not onl...
متن کاملBehaviorism for New Psychology: What Was Wrong with Behaviorism
The evolution of behaviorism from its explicit beginning with John B. Watson’s declaration in 1913 to the behaviorisms of the present is considered briefly. Contributions of behaviorism to scientific psychology then and now are critically assessed, arriving at the conclusion that regardless of whether or not its opponents and proponents are aware, the essential points of behaviorism have now be...
متن کاملProblems of Teaching the Behaviorist Perspective in the Cognitive Revolution
This article offers some personal reflections on the difficulty of teaching the behaviorist perspective in the psychology classroom. The problems focus on the inadequacy of introductory textbooks-which mischaracterize behaviorism, only present the most extreme behaviorist positions, make no mention of the neobehaviorist perspective, fail to discuss that there is no accepted criteria for determi...
متن کامل